Watkins v. Ford
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Montgoméry, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Plaintiff was a member of a copartnership doing business under the firm name of William D. G~. Quig- ' ley & Co., and in August, 1886, claiming to haye acquired *358the interest of his copartner by assignment, brought a suit against defendant in justice’s court, and declared orally in assumpsit.
The defendant also pleaded orally the general issue, and gave notice of set-off and recoupment.
A trial resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appealed to the circuit court for the county of Kent. The plaintiff there filed a declaration in writing as an amended declaration, and abandoned…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ritter v. DanielsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Roethke v. Philip Best Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Bolt v. FriederickMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- McKevitte v. FeigeMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by25 opinions
- Keywell & Rosenfeld v. BithellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Echelon Homes, LLC v. Carter Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- A. Krolik & Co. v. OssowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Chittenden & Eastman Co. v. Leader Furniture Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Converse v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.