J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Company made an importation into New York of barium dioxide, which the collector of customs assessed at the dutiable rate of six cents per pound. This was two cents per pound more than that fixed by statute, par. 12, ch. 356, 42 Stat. 858, 860. The rate was raised by the collector by virtue of the proclamation of the President, 45 Treas. Dec. 669, T. D. 40216, issued under, and by authority of, § 315 of Title III of the Tariff Act of September 21, 1922, ch. 356, 42 Stat. 858, 941, which is the so-called flexible tariff provision. Protest was made and an appeal was taken…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by833 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
828 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.