Legal Opinion
Hill v. Dittmer
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 2011No. B226017PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
Sandra Hill and Thomas Dittmer are ending their seven-year marriage. Because each had brought considerable personal wealth to the marriage, Dittmer insisted that they enter into a premarital agreement (Agreement). Hill agreed and had her attorney draft the document including additions and revisions requested by Dittmer’s counsel. Dittmer and Hill signed the Agreement on the day of the wedding, prior to the ceremony.
In 2008, Hill filed for dissolution of the marriage. In the ensuing proceedings, Hill challenged the validity of the Agreement, alleging that it was the product of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Wal-Noon Corp. v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re Marriage of DawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of Pendleton & FiremanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berman v. Berman (In re Berman), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Clarke v. Akel (In re Clarke), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Zarubin v. Miotke (In re Miotke), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Marriage of Jones-Geeting and Geeting CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Marriage of Molle CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.