Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Pendleton & Fireman

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2000No. S070018PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We are asked to decide whether a premarital agreement in which the parties to be married waive the right to spousal support in case of dissolution is enforceable.1 The Court of Appeal held that such agreements are enforceable. It is not necessary to decide in this case whether all such agreements are enforceable regardless of the circumstances of the parties at the time enforcement is sought. We conclude that no policy of this state makes an agreement like that entered into by the parties to this action per se unenforceable, and affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

I

Back…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API