Clarke v. Akel (In re Clarke)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtNeedham, J.
*485*916Under Family Code section 1615, subdivision (c)(2), a premarital agreement is unenforceable as to a party who was not represented by counsel and who did not have at least seven calendar days between the date he or she was "first presented" with the agreement and the date it was signed. ( In re Marriage of Hill and Dittmer (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 1046, 1055, 136 Cal.Rptr.3d 700 ( Hill );
*917In re Marriage of Cadwell-Faso & Faso 2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 945, 949, 119 Cal.Rptr.3d 818 ( Caldwell-Faso ).) Evidence Code section 622 provides that the facts recited in a written instrument, other than the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bruni v. DidionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of Santa Cruz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Diablo Valley College Faculty Senate v. Contra Costa Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cadwell-Faso v. FasoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Facter v. FacterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flynn v. LoveDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Golden Gate Way, LLC v. Enercon Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Last v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2023