Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Crews

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 16, 2010No. 26870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Following an investigation and hearing, a Hearing Panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (Panel) found that Samuel Crews (Respondent) committed numerous acts of misconduct and recommended that Respondent be disbarred, ordered to pay costs of the proceedings, and ordered to pay restitution to clients and the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection. Respondent now challenges the Panel’s recommendation. As recommended by the Panel; we disbar Respondent, order him to pay restitution, and order him to pay the costs of the proceedings.

FACTS

The charges in this matter stem primarily from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of BabilisUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Zurcher v. BiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. REIDMAN CORP. v. Greenville Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. In Re LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Catawba Indian Nation v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Lord v. D & J Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Crosby v. Prysmian Communications Cables & Systems USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. In Re DickeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Crosby v. Prysmian Communications Cables & Systems USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API