Legal Opinion
Catawba Indian Nation v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 2, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2012-212118; No. 27374PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
The Catawba Indian Nation (the “Tribe”) brought this declaratory judgment action against the State of South Carolina and Mark Keel (collectively, the “State”) to determine the effect of the Gambling Cruise Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 3-11-100 to -500 (Supp.2013), on its gambling rights. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the State, finding: (1) the Tribe’s action was precluded by collateral estoppel and/or res judicata, and (2) the Gambling Cruise Act does not confer upon the Tribe the right to offer video poker and similar electronic play devices on its Reservation as the Act does not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Beall v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- RFT Management Company LLC v. John PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Stewart v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Zinn v. CFI Sales & Marketing, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- Guy v. Carrington Mortgage Services (In re Guy)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.