Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Prysmian Communications Cables & Systems USA, LLC
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided February 6, 2012No. 4876PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFew, C.J.
This appeal is before us on petitions for rehearing filed by Appellant and Respondent. We grant both petitions, and substitute the following opinion.
The workers’ compensation commission found that Melissa Crosby was injured in the course and scope of her employment with Prysmian Communications Cables and Systems *104USA.1 Prysmian fired her nineteen days after her injury. Crosby sued Prysmian for retaliatory discharge under section 41-1-80 of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2011), claiming she was fired for filing a workers’ compensation claim. In a motion for summary judgment, Crosby asked the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Beall v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Zurcher v. BiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Westman v. DessellierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re FriedbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Andrew Pampu v. Erin WingoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
- Friedberg v. NeierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- In re: Richard H. FriedbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Wise v. South Carolina Department of RevenueDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020