Legal Opinion

Zurcher v. Bilton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 2008No. 26531PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

Appellant initiated a civil action against Respondents alleging various torts arising out of a physical altercation between the parties. The trial court granted Respondents’ motion for summary judgment as to each claim on the grounds that Appellant’s Alford plea in a previous criminal proceeding collaterally estopped Appellant from litigating a civil claim based on the same facts as the criminal conviction. We affirm.

Factual/Procedural Background

In June 2004, Appellant Rodney Zurcher (“Zurcher”) approached Respondent Joey Bilton (“Bilton”) in Bilton’s office at the Woody…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hansson v. Scalise Builders of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Houck v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. South Carolina Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Havens v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Gina Lee v. James AnastiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Judy v. JudyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Catawba Indian Nation v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Brian J. Noel v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API