Zurcher v. Bilton
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
Appellant initiated a civil action against Respondents alleging various torts arising out of a physical altercation between the parties. The trial court granted Respondents’ motion for summary judgment as to each claim on the grounds that Appellant’s Alford plea in a previous criminal proceeding collaterally estopped Appellant from litigating a civil claim based on the same facts as the criminal conviction. We affirm.
Factual/Procedural Background
In June 2004, Appellant Rodney Zurcher (“Zurcher”) approached Respondent Joey Bilton (“Bilton”) in Bilton’s office at the Woody…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hansson v. Scalise Builders of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Houck v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- South Carolina Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Havens v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Gina Lee v. James AnastiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Judy v. JudyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Catawba Indian Nation v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Brian J. Noel v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.