Legal Opinion

In Re Larkin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 23, 1999No. 24994PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, Respondent Larkin is charged with engaging in misconduct in violation of various provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) contained in Rule 407, SCACR, and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413, SCACR. The Sub-Panel recommended an Indefinite Suspension. 1 The Full Panel adopted the Sub-Panel’s report and recommendation. Respondent stipulated to the majority of facts found by the Panel, and does not except to the recommended sanction; however, he requests the sanction be retroactive to Jan. 8, 1998, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Matter of KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. In Re GloverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. In re CabanissSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. In re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re HazzardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. In Re CrewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. In Re HoffmeyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API