Legal Opinion
In Re Dickey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 21, 2011No. 27066PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (“Commission”) investigated eight allegations of misconduct against James H. Dickey (“Respondent”). The allegations accused Respondent of, among other things, making false representations to judges and opposing counsel, failing to diligently pursue litigation matters, failing to comply with a fee dispute award and several court orders, engaging in conflicts of interest, and practicing law while on Interim Suspension. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) filed formal charges against Respondent.
A Hearing Panel of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In Re GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Kurschner v. City of Camden Planning CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Peeler v. Spartan Radiocasting, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Matter of MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re BergerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Adams v. H.R. Allen, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- In re DickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- In re DickeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Barry W. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026