R & S INVESTMENTS v. Howard
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, C. J.:
The appellant brought this action seeking specific performance, or in the alternative damages, predicated upon a contract with respondents to purchase a parcel of real estate in Clark County. The court below denied appellant any relief and this appeal followed. Respondents have also cross-appealed from the court’s refusal to award them attorney’s fees. We affirm the judgment in all respects.
THE FACTS
On April 9, 1973, an Offer and Acceptance Agreement and Earnest Money Receipt was signed by A. D. Rosenzweig, acting for appellant, and by respondents.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- McCown v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hillman v. BusselleArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- COTTONWOOD COVE CORPORATION v. BatesNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Cook v. NordstrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tiller v. 166 Auto AuctionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Aztec Gas & Oil Corp. v. Roemer Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Holmby, Inc. v. DinoNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- 1St One Hundred Inv. Pool, Llc Vs. U.S. Bank Nat'L Ass'NNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Aztec Gas & Oil Corp. v. Roemer Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997