Legal Opinion
Tiller v. 166 Auto Auction
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 2001No. 24007PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.
Harry Tiller (“Employee”) appeals an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) which denied his Application for Review Because of Change of Condition (“motion”) seeking to modify a workers’ compensation award against his employer, 166 Auto Auction (“Employer”). The Commission asserted that it did not have jurisdiction to consider Employee’s motion because the original award had been satisfied. Employee argues that the Commission retained jurisdiction over the award because at the time Employee filed his motion, his appeal of the award…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Davis v. Research Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State ex rel. Missouri Cable Telecommunications Ass'n v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Saunders v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Hayes v. Federal Shipbuilding Dry Dock Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Johnson v. St. John's Mercy Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Stachowski v. Sysco Food Services of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- J & M Securities v. MeesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Neil Aaron Carver v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2023
- Pension Advisory Group, Inc. Paul D. Hinson v. Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.