Cook v. Nordstrand
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sought damages for breach of contract to convey real property. In a trial without a jury, judgment was for defendant and plaintiffs appeal therefrom.
The defendant employed a real estate broker to sell her house and lot. On October 8, 1945, the plaintiffs, and a saleslady who was employed by the broker went to the home of defendant, inspected it and then left. (The saleslady will be referred to as the agent.) A few days later, in a telephone conversation, plaintiff Mr. Cook told defendant that he would like to have a construction engineer inspect the property. On…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- House v. PierecyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. HarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Simpson v. SchurraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Wilson v. RosenkranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Taylor v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- De Campos v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Sackett v. SpindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Long Investment Co. v. O'DONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- R & S INVESTMENTS v. HowardNevada Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.