Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Busselle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1947No. 4962PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying recovery in an action brought by plaintiffs (appellants) against defendants (appellees) for: . (1) The return of earnest money paid on an executory contract for sale of a parcel of realty known as the Cable Hotel in Douglas, Arizona, and (2) for alleged damages resulting from defendants’ failure to convey. The case was ried to the court without aid of a jury.

Defendants were the owners of the realty in question and the only portion of the contract to sell to plaintiffs which was in writing was the receipt given for the earnest money as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Malmberg v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Steele v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Roosevelt Irrigation DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Nicolopoolos v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re O'Connor's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rorebeck v. CristeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Tripp v. ChubbArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. DiBiasio v. DiFazioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API