Holmby, Inc. v. Dino
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal follows a summary judgment entered in favor of respondent Dino, seller of certain real estate, and against appellant Holmby, Inc., the buyer. We affirm the summary judgment, thereby disposing of the appeal and cross-appeals.
In September of 1976, the parties entered into an agreement concerning the sale and purchase of two adjacent parcels of land. The agreement specified that escrow was to close on December 15, 1976, unless the buyer complied with certain conditions necessary to extend the escrow period. The agreement required Holmby to deposit $2,000.00 for the two parcels…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Reno Realty and Investment Co. v. HornsteinNevada Supreme Court · 1956
- Swanson v. ThurberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Pothast v. KindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- R & S INVESTMENTS v. HowardNevada Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Nga 2 Limited Liability Co. v. RainsNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Lacy v. G.D. Searle & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1984
- Mostrong v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Greenland Super Mkt., Inc. Vs. Kl Vegas, Llc C/W 74931Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Greenland Super Mkt., Inc. Vs. Kl Vegas, Llc C/W 74931Nevada Supreme Court · 2019