Legal Opinion

State v. Herrick

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1999No. Criminal 980082-84PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Curtis Herrick appeals the trial court’s judgment reinstating his criminal convictions on remand. We affirm, holding the exclusionary remedy allows law enforcement officers who acted in good faith on a no-knoek search warrant issued on a per se basis, prior to State v. Herrick, 1997 ND 155, 567 N.W.2d 336 [Herrick I], under N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-32(3) to validly execute the warrant.

I

[¶ 2] On February 27, 1995, Officer LeRoy Gross of the Stutsman County Drug Task Force searched garbage in the alley behind Herrick’s home. Gross found a paper clip with marijuana residue, a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. DearbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. KieperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. UtvickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API