Legal Opinion

State v. Wanzek

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1999No. 990053PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Kimberly K. Wanzek appealed from a district court judgment of conviction of possession of a controlled substance. Wanzek argues the trial court erred when it denied her motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of her vehicle following her arrest. We affirm the conviction.

I

[¶ 2] Just after midnight on April 20, 1998, Officer Thomas Nagel of the Jamestown Police Department issued a parking ticket to a vehicle located in an alley. A license check revealed the owner of the vehicle, Wanzek, did not have a valid operator’s license. As Officer Nagel was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. HeitzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. GenreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. TognottiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. HaverlukNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API