Legal Opinion

Roth v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2007No. 20060241PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Todd A. Roth appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Roth argues his trial and appellate counsel was plainly ineffective for failing to challenge the nighttime provision of the warrant issued to search his home. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In late August 2002, the State charged Roth with possession of methamphetamine, possession of drug paraphernalia, and manufacture of a controlled substance. Roth was charged after law enforcement searched his home with a warrant during the early morning hours on August 28, 2002. Roth’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Peterka v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. LundeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API