Roth v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Todd A. Roth appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Roth argues his trial and appellate counsel was plainly ineffective for failing to challenge the nighttime provision of the warrant issued to search his home. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In late August 2002, the State charged Roth with possession of methamphetamine, possession of drug paraphernalia, and manufacture of a controlled substance. Roth was charged after law enforcement searched his home with a warrant during the early morning hours on August 28, 2002. Roth’s…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lindsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Peterka v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. LundeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.