Legal Opinion

State v. Utvick

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2004No. 20030103PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from a trial court decision granting Ryan Utvick’s motion to suppress evidence. We reverse and remand, concluding the trial court erred in determining the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply and improperly granted Utvick’s motion to suppress evidence.

I

[¶ 2] On July 8, 2002, Fargo police officer Glen Hanson applied for a no-knock search warrant to search a hotel room registered to Utvick. He believed Utvick’s hotel room contained methamphetamine, marijuana, drug paraphernalia and items indicating Utvick was selling drugs. In his…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. HaibeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API