Legal Opinion
United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 13, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-50; Court 11-00078PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BARZILAY, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff United States brings this action pursuant to section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1592, seeking recovery of lost duties (Count I), lost antidumping duties (Count II), and penalties based upon negligence (Count III). Compl. ¶¶ 33-39. Currently before the court is Defendant Nitek Electronics, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Nitek”) motion to dismiss this action pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) for failure to state a claim. For the reasons below, the court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- United States v. International Trading Services, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- United States v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- PAO Severstal v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- One World Techs., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.