Legal Opinion
Chemstrand Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 9, 1957No. 8 Div. 815PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.
Pursuant to an agreement with its employees whereby it undertook to pay the cost of their movement, including the cost of moving household goods and the insurance premium thereon, the Chemstrand Corporation, appellant, acting through its assistant treasurer, A. W. Lucas, procured a blanket transportation policy from the Maryland Casualty Company, appellee. This policy went into effect September 1, 1953.
In October 1953, J. B. Steen, Jr., appellant, and William C. Blackwood, employees of Chemstrand, arranged to have their household goods moved by Burnham’s Van Service,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Illinois Automobile Ins. Exch. v. Southern Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- &198tna Casualty Surety Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam CasualtySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Jack v. Standard Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. RoyalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Green v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Kinnon v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.