Legal Opinion

Illinois Automobile Ins. Exch. v. Southern Motor Sales Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1922No. 6 Div. 476PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, j.

This is an action instituted’ by appellee against appellant on a policy of indemnity against certain losses that may be suffered by automobile owners. There was verdict and judgment for the defendant; but the motion for new trial was granted, this appeal being from that action of the trial court. Among other things, the policy held by the insured contained indemnity against “(B) Theft, robbery or pilferage if in excess of $25.00 on any single occasion, by any person or persons other than those” in the employment, etc., of the assured. The facts, to be later outlined, make no case…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WimbishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Black v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PlasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Employers Insurance Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. RivesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Granger v. New Jersey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Home Ins. Co. v. PettitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Trans-Continental Mutual Insurance Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API