Legal Opinion
&198tna Casualty Surety Co. v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 16, 1941No. 6 Div. 768PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
’ A retail grocer owned and operated a % ton pick-up Chevrolet truck in connection with his grocery business.
He took out an “Automobile Basic Liability Policy” on .this truck, particularly described, covering “bodily injury liability.”
During the policy period, he turned in the truck to a repair company for repairs. This company furnished him its own truck, a Ford V-8, % ton pick-up truck, for use while his truck was undergoing repairs. It was contemplated the ensuing day would be consumed in making repairs. While operating this Ford truck in connection with such grocery…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
- Dean v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Clarno v. Gamble-Robinson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
3Cited by35 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Koehn v. Union Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.