Legal Opinion
Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam Casualty
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 4, 1937No. 6 Div. 999PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
Suit by appellant — plaintiff in the court below — against appellee upon a public liability insurance policy.
The plaintiff stated its cause of action in two counts, each upon the policy contract. The pleading thereto was in short by consent. The trial resulted in verdict and judgment for defendant upon instructions of the court, given upon an agreed statement of facts.
The material provisions of the policy, omitting such as are not here in point, are:
“The New Amsterdam Casualty Company does hereby agree with the assured (Loveman, Joseph and Loeb) named in the schedule of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TorranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. TollisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Leaksville Light & Power Co. v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mooradian v. Canal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Selective Logging Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Ketona Chemical Corporation v. Globe Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Hercules Powder CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.