Legal Opinion
Kobyluck v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 2002No. AC 21641PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendants1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court remanding the plaintiffs’2 zoning appeals to the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Montville (board) for a new hearing. The defendants claim impropriety in the court’s conclusion that General Statutes § 8-7 requires that the parties to a zoning appeal receive written notice of the hearing thereon and that the defendants’ failure to provide the plaintiffs with such notice violated the plaintiffs’ due process rights. We conclude that there is no final judgment and, therefore, dismiss the appeal.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. AudetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Carr v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- City of Stamford v. StephensonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Rocque v. Sound Manufacturing, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.