Legal Opinion
State v. Stevenson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 15, 2004No. SC 16824PublishedCited by 206 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The issue in this certified appeal1 is whether certain questions posed by the assistant state’s attorney to the defendant during cross-examination and *566certain remarks made by the assistant state’s attorney in final argument deprived the defendant of a fair trial. We conclude that the defendant was not deprived of his right to a fair trial. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court to the contrary.
The state charged the defendant, Jimmy Stevenson, with burglary in the second degree as an accessory in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-82 and 53a-102,3…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by206 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. WarholicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.