Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Glencliff Dairy Products Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1941No. 35,315PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This case arises under the workmen’s compensation act. Respondents, the employer and its insurance carrier, appeal from a compensation award made to an injured employee. The issue presented is whether written notice of claim was served in time. The answer will be found to turn on the question of whether “compensation” was paid by the employer within certain periods following the injury.

Harry Pittman, the appellee, was employed as a cream tester by the Glencliff Dairy Products Company at Independence, Kan., at a salary of $80 a month. On or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richardson v. National Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Rupp v. JacobsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Ketchell v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Long v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Hunt v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Head v. Triangle Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Larrick v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Landauer v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API