Legal Opinion

Rupp v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1939No. 34,296PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

AlleN, J.;

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The legal question to be determined is whether the claim for compensation was made within the time required by the statute. The trial court held the claim was not made in time. Plaintiff appeals.

A preliminary question is presented. Defendants have filed a *713motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal presents no question of law for review. In support of this motion plaintiff relies on cases where a denial of claimant’s demand for compensation raised no question of law, but called for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. McGhee v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Palmer v. FinckeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Stanley v. United Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Alexander v. Chrysler Motor Parts Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Daugherty v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Fitzwater v. Boeing Airplane Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API