Legal Opinion
Forcellati v. Hyland's, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 1, 2012No. CV 12-1983-GHK (MEWx)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re: Motion to Dismiss Complaint; [8]
GEORGE H. KING, District Judge.
Beatrice Herrera, Deputy Clerk.
This matter is before us on Defendants Hyland’s, Inc. (“Hyland’s”), Standard Homeopathic Laboratories, Inc., and Standard Homeopathic Company’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint (“Motion”). We have considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to this Motion and deem this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. L.R. 7-15. As the Parties are familiar with the facts, we will repeat them only as necessary.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cousins v. LockyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Frenzel v. AliphcomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Brady v. Basic Research, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.