Legal Opinion
Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 2014No. 13-cv-3073 (NSR)PublishedCited by 187 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NELSON S. ROMÁN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Goldemberg (“Plaintiff’) commenced the instant action against Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (“Defendant”) seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief for alleged violations of New York state statutory and common law. In his complaint, Plaintiff asserts three causes of action against Defendant: deceptive acts and practices in violation of General Business Law § 349 (“GBL § 349”), common law breach of express warranties, and common law unjust enrichment.
Defendant now moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Buonasera v. Honest Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Weisblum v. Prophase Labs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.