Legal Opinion
Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2012No. 09-55376PublishedCited by 504 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge D.W. NELSON.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Honda appeals the district court’s decision to certify a nationwide class of all consumers who purchased or leased Aeura RLs equipped with a Collision Mitigation Braking System (“CMBS”) during a 3 year period under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). Plaintiffs allege that certain advertisements misrepresented the characteristics of the CMBS and omitted material information on its limitations. The complaint states four claims under California Law. Honda contends: (1) that Plaintiffs failed to satisfy Rule…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by504 opinions
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Caitlin Ahearn v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-Op v. Bumble Bee Foods LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
499 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.