Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 7, 2012No. C 12-04936 LBPublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff 'Scott Miller . bought a package of “Ghirardelli Chocolate Premium Baking Chips Classic White” and then — on behalf of himself and other consumers — sued Ghirardelli Chocolate, complaining that this and four other Ghirardelli Chocolate products were marketed as “White” or “White Chocolate Flavored” when they did not contain any white chocolate, in.violation of the following state laws: (1) the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ.Code § 1750 et seq.; (2)…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Cortina v. Goya Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
  3. Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Clancy v. Bromley Tea Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  5. Kelly v. Cape Cod Potato Chip Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API