Ascher v. Kulongoski
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*542DURHAM, J.
This is an original proceeding in which petitioners challenge the Attorney General’s ballot title for two initiative measures that the Secretary of State’s office has designated as “Elections Division #48” and “#50.” Those measures are identical in every respect. The Attorney General certified the same ballot title for both measures. Because petitioners present the same challenge to the Attorney General’s ballot title for both measures, we address that challenge in one opinion.
Petitioners are electors who, in a timely manner, submitted written comments about the Attorney General’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 47)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 47)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 47)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.