Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1996No. SC S42629Published

1DissentUnis, J.

After my dissenting opinion in Rooney v. Kulongoski (Elections Division #13), 322 Or 15, 55, 902 P2d 1143 (1995), I have filed dissenting opinions in all subsequent cases in which this court has drafted and certified a ballot title that is different from the one prepared by the Attorney General. In each of those opinions, I have said:

“[T]o the extent that ORS 250.085(5) gives this court jurisdiction to draft and certify a ballot title for a proposed initiative measure that is different from the one certified by the Attorney General, that statute violates the principle of separation of powers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sizemore v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 49)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sizemore v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API