Legal Opinion

Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1996No. SC S42629PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*518DURHAM, J.

This is an original proceeding in which petitioners challenge the Attorney General’s ballot title for a proposed initiative measure that the Secretary of State’s office has designated as “Elections Division #46.”1 Petitioners are electors who, in a timely manner, submitted written comments about the Attorney General’s draft ballot title, pursuant to ORS 250.067(1). Accordingly, they are entitled to seek a different title in this court. ORS 250.085(2). We modify the ballot title in certain respects and, as modified, certify it to the Secretary of State.2

At the outset, we note that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sizemore v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 49)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sizemore v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 49)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 47)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ascher v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 47)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API