Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public Schools
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Appellants urge us to hold that the Equal Protection Clause forbids a State to allow some local school boards, but not others, to assess a fee for transporting pupils between their homes and the public schools. Applying well-established equal protection principles, we reject this claim and affirm the constitutionality of the challenged statute.
HH
North Dakota is a sparsely populated State, with many people living on isolated farms and ranches. One result has *453been that some children, as late as the mid-20th century, were educated in “the one-room school where, in many cases, there [we]re twenty…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by361 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hayden v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Lewis v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
356 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.