Legal Opinion

Nakamoto v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1995No. SC S42434PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*183DURHAM, J.

This is an original proceeding in which petitioners challenge the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure.1 Petitioners are electors who submitted timely written comments about the Attorney General’s draft ballot title, pursuant to ORS 250.067(1). Accordingly, petitioners are entitled to seek a different title in this court. ORS 250.085(2) (1993). We modify the ballot title in certain respects and, as modified, certify it to the Secretary of State.2

The Attorney General certified the following ballot title for the measure to the Secretary of State:

“FORBIDS GOVERNMENT…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Nelson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Crumpton v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. McCoid v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Kane v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 49)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 46)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 47)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ascher v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API