Stevens v. Bispham
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*223GILLETTE, J.
This is a professional negligence action brought by a former criminal defendant against the lawyer who defended him. The issue presented for our decision is this: At what point does the statute of limitations for legal malpractice begin to run with respect to a lawyer’s defense of a client who has been convicted in a criminal case? We hold that it does not begin to run until the plaintiff has been exonerated of the criminal offense through reversal on direct appeal, through post-conviction relief proceedings, or otherwise.
Plaintiff, charged with three counts of Robbery I, three…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Steele v. KehoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Wiley v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.