Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Keate
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 1992No. C1-91-665PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding, the referee found that respondent’s conduct, tak en together with his prior discipline, constituted an ongoing pattern of misconduct in violation of Rules 1.3, 1.4 and 3.2 of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. The referee recommended that respondent be publicly reprimanded and be placed on supervised probation for one year.
Respondent has been licensed to practice law in Minnesota since 1976. The director brought charges of professional misconduct against respondent based on his representation of clients in four separate matters. One of these matters…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Disciplinary Action Against O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Marc G. KURZMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 59080Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.