Legal Opinion
Golberg v. Sanglier
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 2, 1980No. 7346-0-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
This appeal arises from an action commenced on March 30, 1978, by Robert and Peggy Golberg and Miriam Pierce against John Sanglier and his wife, Nick Carras and his wife, and Sanglier Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc. The plaintiffs' complaint alleged and claimed in part that Robert Golberg, Miriam Pierce, John Sanglier, and Nick Carras had entered into a partnership in 1974; that Sanglier and Carras thereafter successfully conspired to defeat the other partners' interests; that Sanglier and Carras obtained a dissolution of the partnership by means of fraud and misrepresentation; that Sanglier and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Kittilson v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Clausing v. DeHartWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Sherwood & Roberts—Yakima, Inc. v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Torgerson v. One Lincoln Tower, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Viking Properties, Inc. v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.