Legal Opinion
Kittilson v. Ford
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1980No. 46378PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
This case is before us on appeal as a matter of right. See Laws of 1979, ch. 102, § 1(e), p. 397. Plaintiff brought this action against Ford and defendant Kirkingburg alleging (1) a violation of The Securities Act of Washington (Securities Act), RCW 21.20; (2) a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86; and, in the alternative, (3) a claim against defendant Kirkingburg based on common-law fraud. Although a default judgment was entered for plaintiff against defendant Ford, the court granted the motion of defendant Kirkingburg for summary judgment on all three causes of action.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Shermer v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Kittilson v. FordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Ludwig v. Mutual Real Estate InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Burgess v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Russell v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Lindner v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.