Legal Opinion

Viking Properties, Inc. v. Holm

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2005No. 75240-1PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 J.M. Johnson, J.

Appellant homeowners (Homeowners) and respondent Viking Properties, Inc. (Viking), own residential properties in a subdivision in the city of Shoreline (City) subject to a decades-old restrictive covenant. The covenant bars racial minorities from ownership of the land and imposes a density limitation providing that there may be no more than one dwelling on each one-half acre. Viking asked Homeowners to release the entire covenant so Viking could redevelop a lot it purchased in 2002. After Homeowners refused this demand, Viking *116filed a declaratory judgment action to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Woods v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Woods v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Thurston County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lewis County v. WESTERN WA. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Thurston County v. W. WASH. GROWTH MANAGEMENTWashington Supreme Court · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API