Viking Properties, Inc. v. Holm
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 J.M. Johnson, J.
Appellant homeowners (Homeowners) and respondent Viking Properties, Inc. (Viking), own residential properties in a subdivision in the city of Shoreline (City) subject to a decades-old restrictive covenant. The covenant bars racial minorities from ownership of the land and imposes a density limitation providing that there may be no more than one dwelling on each one-half acre. Viking asked Homeowners to release the entire covenant so Viking could redevelop a lot it purchased in 2002. After Homeowners refused this demand, Viking *116filed a declaratory judgment action to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Woods v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Woods v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Thurston County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Lewis County v. WESTERN WA. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Thurston County v. W. WASH. GROWTH MANAGEMENTWashington Supreme Court · 2008
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.