Legal Opinion

King v. Riveland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1994No. 61647-7PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

At issue in this case is the validity of the trial court’s order upholding a confidentiality agreement and permanently enjoining the release of certain information obtained from inmates participating in the Sexual Offender Treatment Program at the Twin Rivers Correction Center in Monroe, Washington.

Pacts

In 1988, the Department of Corrections (DOC) instituted the Sexual Offender Treatment Program (SOTP) at the Twin Rivers Correction Center. According to its director, the purpose of the program is to provide therapy to inmates convicted of sex crimes in order to reduce their risk of re-offense…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. LoewenWashington Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Keystone Land & Development Co. v. Xerox Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API