Legal Opinion
Golberg v. Sanglier
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1982No. 47422-2PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Petitioners Robert Golberg and Miriam Pierce seek review of the Court of Appeals reversal of the trial court's judgment in their favor and its dismissal of petitioners' claim against their former partners, respondents John D. Sanglier and Nick Carras. Petitioners received an award of damages based on the trial court's finding that the sale of their partnership interest to the remaining partners was induced by fraud. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and dismissed petitioners' case with prejudice, finding the partnership agreement was illegal and thus unenforceable. We review that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Batten v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Xieng v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Nelson v. McGoldrickWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Welfare of ABWashington Supreme Court · 2010
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.