Legal Opinion

Omeitt v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1944No. 29415PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff was injured in February, 1942, while engaged in extrahazardous employment as defined and classified in the workmen’s compensation act. He was hospitalized, given medical treatment, and reimbursed for his time loss. His claim for compensation, filed with the department of labor and industries, was closed by the supervisor of industrial insurance in June, 1942, with an award of $418.80 for permanent partial disability. Being dissatisfied with the amount of the award, plaintiff petitioned for and was granted a rehearing by the joint board. At the rehearing, testimony of both lay and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hart v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Richey & Gilbert Co. v. Northwestern Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Grange v. FinlayWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sepich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ehman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Rettinger v. BresnahanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Ruff v. Fruit Delivery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API