Legal Opinion

Grange v. Finlay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1961No. 35709PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This action was brought by the owners of a pleasure boat moorage on Lake Washington, alleging that their moorage facilities had been damaged by a fire which resulted from the negligence of William T. Finlay, hereafter referred to as the defendant. After a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, the court granted a judgment non obstante veredicto on motion of the defendants, and this appeal followed.

Such a motion involves no element of discretion and will not be granted unless the court can say, as a matter of law, that there is neither evidence nor reasonable inference from evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sommer v. Yakima Motor Coach Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Cambro Co. v. SnookWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. BeardenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hojem v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Helman v. Sacred Heart HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Callahan v. Keystone Fireworks Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Campbell v. ITE Imperial Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API