Grange v. Finlay
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This action was brought by the owners of a pleasure boat moorage on Lake Washington, alleging that their moorage facilities had been damaged by a fire which resulted from the negligence of William T. Finlay, hereafter referred to as the defendant. After a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, the court granted a judgment non obstante veredicto on motion of the defendants, and this appeal followed.
Such a motion involves no element of discretion and will not be granted unless the court can say, as a matter of law, that there is neither evidence nor reasonable inference from evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Sommer v. Yakima Motor Coach Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Cambro Co. v. SnookWashington Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. BeardenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Hojem v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Helman v. Sacred Heart HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Callahan v. Keystone Fireworks Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Campbell v. ITE Imperial Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.