Legal Opinion

Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1988No. WCB 84-02476; CA A37693PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in the light of Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or 345, 746 P2d 218 (1987). We adhere to our former opinion. 84 Or App 127, 733 P2d 113, modified 85 Or App 477, 737 P2d 617 (1987).

In Gwynn, the claimant had suffered a disabling injury and had entered into a settlement agreement which awarded compensation for permanent partial disability. The issue was whether the claimant’s award contemplated future “waxing and waning” of his symptoms and, if so, whether the claimant had established a “worsening” of the condition entitling him to additional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Young v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Krajacic v. Blazing OrchardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Krajacic v. Blazing OrchardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Miller v. Wagon Trail RanchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API