Legal Opinion

Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 20, 1987No. WCB 84-02476; CA A37693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Claimant has filed a petition for review, which we treat as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. In our opinion, Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards, 84 Or App 127, 733 P2d 113 (1987), we said:

“[The doctor’s] statement that claimant’s injury is permanent only indicates a waxing and waning of symptoms of the chronic condition for which he had received an award.”

We grant reconsideration only to correct a factual error. Petitioner correctly points out that he had not received an award on his claim. As noted in our opinion, 84 Or App at 131, the claim was classified as nondisabling. We still hold…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krajacic v. Blazing OrchardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Krajacic v. Blazing OrchardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Avalos v. BowyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Miller v. Wagon Trail RanchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API