Legal Opinion

Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1987No. WCB 84-02476; CA A37693PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Claimant petitions for judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order which found that he did not perfect an aggravation claim pursuant to ORS 656.273 and denied payment for out-of-state chiropractic treatment. We affirm on the aggravation claim and reverse on the payment for out-of-state treatment.

Claimant sustained a low back injury in September, 1977. The claim was accepted and classified as nondisabling. Claimant has had ongoing treatment and consultations since 1977. The medical reports indicate that he had a chronic lumbosacral strain.

Claimant relies primarily on two letters…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Reynaga v. Northwest Farm BureauOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krajacic v. Blazing OrchardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Krajacic v. Blazing OrchardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Avalos v. BowyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Miller v. Wagon Trail RanchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API